MANCHESTER, England — As he
trudged, wordlessly, away from the field, away from the crowd, away from the
burning humiliation, Maurizio Sarri looked like a man who knew. He is not the
first in his position to have worn that look, to have made that walk, to sense
that, sooner or later, Chelsea has a decision to make.
In these
circumstances, that ordinarily means only one thing. Historically, when Chelsea
is presented with the choice of whether to fire a manager or not, it tends to
act as if it has no choice at all.
Roman Abramovich
has fired managers early and fired them late. He has fired them after winning
the Premier League title but not the Champions League; he has fired them after
winning the Champions League but not the Premier League. He has fired them against
the fans’ wishes, and he has fired them to their intense relief. He has fired
them for less than being beaten, 6-0, by Manchester City, as Sarri’s Chelsea
was on Sunday, and he has fired them for more.
Abramovich has
been through 13 permanent managers since he arrived in English soccer in 2003.
By this stage of this season, Abramovich — or, more pertinently, those who run
Chelsea at his behest — knows the signs. Not just the obvious ones: the
back-to-back collapses away from home, first at Bournemouth and
now in Manchester; the inexorable slide down the Premier League table,
initially out of the title race and now, usurped by a resurgent Manchester
United, out of the Champions
League qualifying places.
No comments:
Post a Comment